Are Seven has moved! Go to areseven.com

This page has moved from its Blogspot origins and is now on a hosted server. If you're getting here from a blogspot.com bookmark or feed, stop where you are, go to areseven.com and never look back.

If you're feeling lazy, just hang on a couple seconds and you'll be redirected automatically.


Friday, September 10, 2004

Meaning and saying

This was predictable:

Cheney Softens Comments on Kerry and Terror Threat
Like we couldn't all see it coming from miles away.

I don't believe for a second that Dick Cheney didn't know exactly what he was saying. This is a political tactic that seems to be becoming more popular, and it works. You say something that plants a seed in people's minds (especially if it's a fear seed) and then come out and say later that, no, they were misquoted. It has two good effects: one, it allows candidates to essentially slander their opponents while also a) blaming the media for misquoting them and b) making anyone who was upset by the initial comment feel dumb for misunderstanding and two, it allows them to stretch out the point by making one issue and turning it into two stories: the initial comment and the clarification.

Since getting into office, I'll give every amount of credit to the Bush administration for realizing that, as Republicans, they can get away with stuff that makes the Democrats look like lying weasels. Cheney has now made front-page headlines twice, and both times, has made sure that undecided voters and all Republicans question whether they would *really* be safe with John Kerry in office. You've gotta hand it to them: they're clever.

It still seems a little risky, though. Doesn't it take only a slight bit of effort to piece together that Richard Clark resigned over the Bush Administration's poor handling of terrorism, and that it's possible that the cutbacks and lack of attention to issues of terrorism were partly to blame for the 9/11 attacks? Well, it does take a slight bit of effort, but that still seems more than a lot of people are willing to give it. No, it's true: we'll all die with Kerry at the helm. Better to know that you're not safe than wonder if you're not safe? I don't even know anymore...

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

This gets back to one of my frustrations with the Republicans. They're much better at the tactical side of campaigning than the Dems, but because they're so successful at it, that's all they focus on. They have no incentive whatsoever to actually explore the issues and discuss ideas. And it's not because the Dems have better ideas....each side has a mix of good and bad. It's just that if you have a tried and true method of winning elections, why wouldn't you stick with it as long as it works?

This kind of stuff makes me roll my eyes at my own party, but as much as I'd like to see it stopped, I think the only solution would be for the Democrats to wise up and learn how to do it as well. Once they can match the Republicans strategically, these kinds of tactics will negate each other, and both sides will be forced to debate their actual ideas. I've heard multiple interviews with Bill Clinton where he's said basically the same thing. He and Carville were about the only ones in their party that understood this, which is one very overlooked reason why he won two presidential elections.

-Scott

Anonymous said...

oh, almost forgot:

just sayin' is all. ;)

-Scott